Now that I physically have a Do-More on a test rack with a C-More Screen, I can testify that getting them to talk with K-Sequence isn't that bad at all. And I have some feedback...
1.) Port Setup: Simple, I just changed the Do-More to use 9600Baud, 8 data, 1 stop, odd parity and right away the C-more started to do more (heh heh on the pun.) Same cables as the DL240.
2.) X and Y addresses: Using the MEMCOPY instruction was a breeze, just threw it in the top of scan task and it mirrored everything to my HMI without issue.
3.) C Addresses: Instead of MEMCOPY I ended up just directly referenced the DXC address in my ladder logic. No big deal on this point.
4.) V Adressing: threw me for a loop for about half an hour until I realized that the Do-More was expecting a DLV address to be in unsigned INT, but all my tags in the HMI were setup for BCD. Here's my suggestion for more drop in compatibility for older equipment that is stuck with the Micro or even worse EZTouch

, is to make away to turn the DLV heap into BCD or allow us to cast it.
Most of my HMI's use BCD to make it work with the old D240 Timer commands. Now I ended up just converting every DLV value and storing it in V memory. It's too big of a deal, nor is it a turn off to me about it, but if you didn't catch this it would have you scratching your head...
But all in all, most of my gear that is expecting a D240 doesn't know any better that it's talking to a much better CPU.